DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35518] - Alternate Lucene Query Parser

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35518] - Alternate Lucene Query Parser

Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG?
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35518>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND?
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35518





------- Additional Comments From [hidden email]  2005-06-28 00:46 -------
Created an attachment (id=15541)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15541&action=view)
JUnit test

Hi David,
Thanks for this. I've still not taken the time to add proper phrase/span query
support to the current sandbox highlighter so this will definitely be useful to
folks.
I've adapted portions of the existing highlighter's Junit test to work on your
highlighter code and have attached it here. There are some issues I've noted on
a first pass over the code and these are illustrated in the Junit tests. Some
of them may be deliberate design choices (eg no slop factor support) but others
I'd rate as real issues eg lack of fieldname for use with analyzers.
Going forward I think it would be useful to try retain some of the features of
the existing highlighter (eg IDF weighted fragment scoring, fragSizes defined
in bytes) and merge with your phrase-highlighting features.Adding span query
support would be good too. What I'm less clear on right now is how this is best
achieved.

Thanks again,
Mark

--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]