[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1240) Numerical Range faceting

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1240) Numerical Range faceting

JIRA jira@apache.org

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12890728#action_12890728 ]

Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1240:
------------------------------------

Thanks for the example, makes it so much easier  to casually review.

Rather than embedding "meta" to the list containing the counts, perhaps we should bite the bullet and add an additional level for the counts.  It would have been useful for other faceting types as well (and still would be in the future I think).  It should be much easier (and more consistent) for clients to handle, rather than trying to exclude the thing called "meta" when building the list of counts returned.

{code}
    <lst name="popularity">
        <int name="gap">3</int>
        <int name="end">13</int>
        <int name="before">0</int>
        <int name="after">0</int>
        <int name="between">18</int>
        <lst name="counts">
            <int name="-2">3</int>
            <int name="1">2</int>
            <int name="4">13</int>
            <int name="7">7</int>
            <int name="10">2</int>
        </lst>
    </lst>
{code}

Also, I've never been a fan of adding the empty "facet_range" list when there are no facet.range commands... but I understand it's consistent with the other facet types.

> Numerical Range faceting
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1240
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1240
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: search
>            Reporter: Gijs Kunze
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch
>
>
> For faceting numerical ranges using many facet.query query arguments leads to unmanageably large queries as the fields you facet over increase. Adding the same faceting parameter for numbers which already exists for dates should fix this.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]