[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12697) pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12697) pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature

JIRA jira@apache.org

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16680099#comment-16680099 ]

Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-12697:
---------------------------------------

Can SOLR-12625 be used in this case or, perhaps, reworked to make it usable here? I'd hate to have yet another place where we decode DV fields and yet another place we can miss on the next change to DV....

> pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-12697
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
>          Components: contrib - LTR
>            Reporter: Stanislav Livotov
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: SOLR-12697.patch
>
>
> [~slivotov] wrote in SOLR-12688:
> bq. ... FieldValueFeature doesn't support pure DocValues fields (Stored false). Please also note that for fields which are both stored and DocValues it is working not optimal because it is extracting just one field from the stored document. DocValues are obviously faster for such usecases. ...
> (Please see SOLR-12688 description for overall context and analysis results.)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]