Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64 #175

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
12 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64 #175

Policeman Jenkins Server
See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/175/>

------------------------------------------
[...truncated 10792 lines...]
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.IndexBasedSpellCheckerTest
   [junit4] Completed in 1.18s, 5 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.SOLR749Test
   [junit4] Completed in 0.66s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.LukeRequestHandlerTest
   [junit4] Completed in 2.15s, 3 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.XmlUpdateRequestHandlerTest
   [junit4] Completed in 0.69s, 3 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.OverseerTest
   [junit4] Completed in 33.82s, 7 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryZkTest
   [junit4] Completed in 44.89s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest
   [junit4] Completed in 75.36s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.ZkSolrClientTest
   [junit4] Completed in 14.66s, 4 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedTermsComponentTest
   [junit4] Completed in 14.79s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.AutoCommitTest
   [junit4] Completed in 10.52s, 3 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestJoin
   [junit4] Completed in 12.98s, 2 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.TestFaceting
   [junit4] Completed in 23.93s, 3 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.SpellCheckComponentTest
   [junit4] Completed in 8.20s, 9 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacetsTest
   [junit4] Completed in 8.30s, 29 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.PeerSyncTest
   [junit4] Completed in 6.30s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterFSTTest
   [junit4] Completed in 2.08s, 4 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.SolrInfoMBeanTest
   [junit4] Completed in 1.37s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.similarities.TestLMDirichletSimilarityFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 0.26s, 2 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestWordDelimiterFilterFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 2.05s, 7 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterTSTTest
   [junit4] Completed in 2.25s, 4 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.SpatialFilterTest
   [junit4] Completed in 2.58s, 3 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.SolrCoreCheckLockOnStartupTest
   [junit4] Completed in 2.45s, 2 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterWFSTTest
   [junit4] Completed in 2.20s, 4 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.CacheHeaderTest
   [junit4] Completed in 1.61s, 5 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestSolrDeletionPolicy1
   [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.02s | TestSolrDeletionPolicy1.testCommitAge
   [junit4]    > Assumption #1: This test is not working on Windows (or maybe machines with only 2 CPUs)
   [junit4]   2> 1237 T3010 oas.SolrTestCaseJ4.setUp ###Starting testCommitAge
   [junit4]   2> 1243 T3010 C49 oasu.DirectUpdateHandler2.deleteAll [collection1] REMOVING ALL DOCUMENTS FROM INDEX
   [junit4]   2> 1243 T3010 C49 UPDATE [collection1] webapp=null path=null params={} {deleteByQuery=*:*} 0 1
   [junit4]   2> 1247 T3010 oas.SolrTestCaseJ4.tearDown ###Ending testCommitAge
   [junit4]   2>
   [junit4] Completed in 1.44s, 3 tests, 1 skipped
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.RequestHandlersTest
   [junit4] Completed in 1.21s, 3 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.highlight.FastVectorHighlighterTest
   [junit4] Completed in 1.31s, 2 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.FileBasedSpellCheckerTest
   [junit4] Completed in 1.39s, 3 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.response.TestPHPSerializedResponseWriter
   [junit4] Completed in 1.57s, 2 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.DisMaxRequestHandlerTest
   [junit4] Completed in 1.57s, 3 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandlerOptimizeTest
   [junit4] Completed in 1.09s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestArbitraryIndexDir
   [junit4] Completed in 1.14s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.TestCollationField
   [junit4] Completed in 0.95s, 8 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.TermVectorComponentTest
   [junit4] Completed in 2.25s, 4 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest
   [junit4] Completed in 1.11s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.UpdateParamsTest
   [junit4] Completed in 1.06s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.ReturnFieldsTest
   [junit4] Completed in 1.46s, 10 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestXIncludeConfig
   [junit4] Completed in 1.27s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.UUIDFieldTest
   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestJapaneseTokenizerFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 0.04s, 4 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestLuceneMatchVersion
   [junit4] Completed in 0.41s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.LegacyHTMLStripCharFilterTest
   [junit4] IGNORED 0.00s | LegacyHTMLStripCharFilterTest.testRandom
   [junit4]    > Cause: Annotated @Ignore(broken offsets: see LUCENE-2208)
   [junit4] Completed in 0.83s, 13 tests, 1 skipped
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestCollationKeyFilterFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 0.03s, 5 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.TestPhraseSuggestions
   [junit4] Completed in 0.37s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestCodecSupport
   [junit4] Completed in 0.21s, 3 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestFastLRUCache
   [junit4] Completed in 0.07s, 7 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestSolrXMLSerializer
   [junit4] Completed in 0.04s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestStandardFactories
   [junit4] Completed in 0.06s, 10 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestSlowSynonymFilter
   [junit4] Completed in 0.03s, 7 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.internal.csv.CharBufferTest
   [junit4] Completed in 0.03s, 13 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestSynonymFilterFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 0.03s, 4 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.util.TestSystemIdResolver
   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.ZkNodePropsTest
   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestHunspellStemFilterFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestKeywordMarkerFilterFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 2 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestBrazilianStemFilterFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestGreekStemFilterFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestPorterStemFilterFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.internal.csv.writer.CSVWriterTest
   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 2 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestFrenchMinimalStemFilterFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestIrishLowerCaseFilterFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestPatternTokenizerFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestStemmerOverrideFilterFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 2 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestTrimFilterFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestTurkishLowerCaseFilterFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.internal.csv.writer.CSVConfigGuesserTest
   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 3 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestCzechStemFilterFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestGermanMinimalStemFilterFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestGermanStemFilterFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestItalianLightStemFilterFactory
   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.RAMDirectoryFactoryTest
   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.util.FileUtilsTest
   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandlerTest
   [junit4] Completed in 1.49s, 5 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.PreAnalyzedFieldTest
   [junit4] Completed in 0.03s, 3 tests
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.TestUpdate
   [junit4] Completed in 1.70s, 1 test
   [junit4]  
   [junit4] JVM J0:     1.34 ..  1016.15 =  1014.81s
   [junit4] Execution time total: 16 minutes 56 seconds
   [junit4] Tests summary: 286 suites, 970 tests, 1 failure, 10 ignored (5 assumptions)

BUILD FAILED
<http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/ws/build.xml>:29: The following error occurred while executing this line:
<http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/ws/solr\build.xml>:144: The following error occurred while executing this line:
<http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/ws/lucene\module-build.xml>:62: The following error occurred while executing this line:
<http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/ws/lucene\common-build.xml>:1019: The following error occurred while executing this line:
<http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/ws/lucene\common-build.xml>:745: There were test failures: 286 suites, 970 tests, 1 failure, 10 ignored (5 assumptions)

Total time: 38 minutes 36 seconds
Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure
Recording test results

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Jenkins build is back to normal : Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64 #176

Policeman Jenkins Server
See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/176/>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64 #175

Mark Miller-3
In reply to this post by Policeman Jenkins Server
As far as I can tell, this appears to perhaps be a windows issue with replication - if the logged errors are involved, it's not finding a file to copy that it's expecting to find. Search me as to why. Certainly seems to be finding them on the linux and freebsd runs.

On May 23, 2012, at 8:10 PM, [hidden email] wrote:

> See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/175/>
>
> ------------------------------------------
> [...truncated 10792 lines...]
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.IndexBasedSpellCheckerTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.18s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.SOLR749Test
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.66s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.LukeRequestHandlerTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.15s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.XmlUpdateRequestHandlerTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.69s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.OverseerTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 33.82s, 7 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryZkTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 44.89s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 75.36s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.ZkSolrClientTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 14.66s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedTermsComponentTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 14.79s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.AutoCommitTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 10.52s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestJoin
>   [junit4] Completed in 12.98s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.TestFaceting
>   [junit4] Completed in 23.93s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.SpellCheckComponentTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 8.20s, 9 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacetsTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 8.30s, 29 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.PeerSyncTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 6.30s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterFSTTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.08s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.SolrInfoMBeanTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.37s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.similarities.TestLMDirichletSimilarityFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.26s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestWordDelimiterFilterFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.05s, 7 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterTSTTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.25s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.SpatialFilterTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.58s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.SolrCoreCheckLockOnStartupTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.45s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterWFSTTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.20s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.CacheHeaderTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.61s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestSolrDeletionPolicy1
>   [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.02s | TestSolrDeletionPolicy1.testCommitAge
>   [junit4]    > Assumption #1: This test is not working on Windows (or maybe machines with only 2 CPUs)
>   [junit4]   2> 1237 T3010 oas.SolrTestCaseJ4.setUp ###Starting testCommitAge
>   [junit4]   2> 1243 T3010 C49 oasu.DirectUpdateHandler2.deleteAll [collection1] REMOVING ALL DOCUMENTS FROM INDEX
>   [junit4]   2> 1243 T3010 C49 UPDATE [collection1] webapp=null path=null params={} {deleteByQuery=*:*} 0 1
>   [junit4]   2> 1247 T3010 oas.SolrTestCaseJ4.tearDown ###Ending testCommitAge
>   [junit4]   2>
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.44s, 3 tests, 1 skipped
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.RequestHandlersTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.21s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.highlight.FastVectorHighlighterTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.31s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.FileBasedSpellCheckerTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.39s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.response.TestPHPSerializedResponseWriter
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.57s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.DisMaxRequestHandlerTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.57s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandlerOptimizeTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.09s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestArbitraryIndexDir
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.14s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.TestCollationField
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.95s, 8 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.TermVectorComponentTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.25s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.11s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.UpdateParamsTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.06s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.ReturnFieldsTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.46s, 10 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestXIncludeConfig
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.27s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.UUIDFieldTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestJapaneseTokenizerFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.04s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestLuceneMatchVersion
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.41s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.LegacyHTMLStripCharFilterTest
>   [junit4] IGNORED 0.00s | LegacyHTMLStripCharFilterTest.testRandom
>   [junit4]    > Cause: Annotated @Ignore(broken offsets: see LUCENE-2208)
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.83s, 13 tests, 1 skipped
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestCollationKeyFilterFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.03s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.TestPhraseSuggestions
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.37s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestCodecSupport
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.21s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestFastLRUCache
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.07s, 7 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestSolrXMLSerializer
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.04s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestStandardFactories
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.06s, 10 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestSlowSynonymFilter
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.03s, 7 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.internal.csv.CharBufferTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.03s, 13 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestSynonymFilterFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.03s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.util.TestSystemIdResolver
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.ZkNodePropsTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestHunspellStemFilterFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestKeywordMarkerFilterFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestBrazilianStemFilterFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestGreekStemFilterFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestPorterStemFilterFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.internal.csv.writer.CSVWriterTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestFrenchMinimalStemFilterFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestIrishLowerCaseFilterFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestPatternTokenizerFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestStemmerOverrideFilterFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestTrimFilterFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestTurkishLowerCaseFilterFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.internal.csv.writer.CSVConfigGuesserTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestCzechStemFilterFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestGermanMinimalStemFilterFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestGermanStemFilterFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestItalianLightStemFilterFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.RAMDirectoryFactoryTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.util.FileUtilsTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandlerTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.49s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.PreAnalyzedFieldTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.03s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.TestUpdate
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.70s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] JVM J0:     1.34 ..  1016.15 =  1014.81s
>   [junit4] Execution time total: 16 minutes 56 seconds
>   [junit4] Tests summary: 286 suites, 970 tests, 1 failure, 10 ignored (5 assumptions)
>
> BUILD FAILED
> <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/ws/build.xml>:29: The following error occurred while executing this line:
> <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/ws/solr\build.xml>:144: The following error occurred while executing this line:
> <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/ws/lucene\module-build.xml>:62: The following error occurred while executing this line:
> <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/ws/lucene\common-build.xml>:1019: The following error occurred while executing this line:
> <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/ws/lucene\common-build.xml>:745: There were test failures: 286 suites, 970 tests, 1 failure, 10 ignored (5 assumptions)
>
> Total time: 38 minutes 36 seconds
> Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure
> Recording test results
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>

- Mark Miller
lucidimagination.com












---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64 #175

Yonik Seeley-2-2
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Mark Miller <[hidden email]> wrote:
> As far as I can tell, this appears to perhaps be a windows issue with replication - if the logged errors are involved, it's not finding a file to copy that it's expecting to find. Search me as to why. Certainly seems to be finding them on the linux and freebsd runs.

It's unable to move, followed by unable to copy because "The system
cannot find the path specified".
Windows has the extra issue of not being able to move a file that is
open for any reason, so I imagine one would never get to the copy
logic in UNIX environments?

Even some virus scanners have caused tests (and sometimes even svn) to
fail on windows, so hopefully it's nothing like that.
We should prob add extra logging when both the move and copy fail to
try and pin down exactly why.

-Yonik
http://lucidimagination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64 #175

Uwe Schindler
No virus scanners active, but Windows Search in this VM.

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [hidden email]


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Yonik
> Seeley
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 7:06 AM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64
#175
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Mark Miller <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, this appears to perhaps be a windows issue with
> replication - if the logged errors are involved, it's not finding a file
to copy that
> it's expecting to find. Search me as to why. Certainly seems to be finding
them
> on the linux and freebsd runs.
>
> It's unable to move, followed by unable to copy because "The system cannot
> find the path specified".
> Windows has the extra issue of not being able to move a file that is open
for
> any reason, so I imagine one would never get to the copy logic in UNIX
> environments?
>
> Even some virus scanners have caused tests (and sometimes even svn) to
fail on
> windows, so hopefully it's nothing like that.
> We should prob add extra logging when both the move and copy fail to try
and
> pin down exactly why.
>
> -Yonik
> http://lucidimagination.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional
> commands, e-mail: [hidden email]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64 #175

Mark Miller-3
FWIW, I've been looping this test on my Windows 7 VM and I have not seen a single failure.

Perhaps we should have some Windows retry logic? Not the first time we have needed that I think.


On May 24, 2012, at 2:29 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:

> No virus scanners active, but Windows Search in this VM.

Are there excludes for the lucene/solr dirs? Been I while since I was weighed down with windows, but that always killed my indexing if I didn't exclude my checkout directories.

- Mark Miller
lucidimagination.com












---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64 #175

Uwe Schindler
Hi,

The Jenkins Workspace is installed c:\Jenkins, so outside home dir. In that
case it should not be affected by Indexing. I can check this later.

> FWIW, I've been looping this test on my Windows 7 VM and I have not seen a
> single failure.

It happens not all the time. Just as reminder: This VM has 2 virtual
CPUs/cores!

> Perhaps we should have some Windows retry logic? Not the first time we
have
> needed that I think.

Lucene itsself has it.

>
> On May 24, 2012, at 2:29 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> > No virus scanners active, but Windows Search in this VM.
>
> Are there excludes for the lucene/solr dirs? Been I while since I was
weighed
> down with windows, but that always killed my indexing if I didn't exclude
my

> checkout directories.
>
> - Mark Miller
> lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional
> commands, e-mail: [hidden email]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64 #175

Mark Miller-3
Finally got the same fail on my Windows virt machine - seems harder for me to see, but at least a confirmation.

- Mark Miller
lucidimagination.com












---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64 #175

Mark Miller-3
In reply to this post by Uwe Schindler

On May 24, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The Jenkins Workspace is installed c:\Jenkins, so outside home dir. In that
> case it should not be affected by Indexing. I can check this later.

makes sense - my workspace was in mydocs half the time, or my user dir.

>
>> FWIW, I've been looping this test on my Windows 7 VM and I have not seen a
>> single failure.
>
> It happens not all the time. Just as reminder: This VM has 2 virtual
> CPUs/cores!

My virt machine also has 2 virtual cores. I ran the test over 100 times before I got a failure - so it won't be easy for me to test any fix attempts - we will probably have to just commit something and wait and see what happens on your jenkins runs.

>
>> Perhaps we should have some Windows retry logic? Not the first time we
> have
>> needed that I think.
>
> Lucene itsself has it.

I'm not sure this is the issue yet, but it might be worth a try.

>
>>
>> On May 24, 2012, at 2:29 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>>
>>> No virus scanners active, but Windows Search in this VM.
>>
>> Are there excludes for the lucene/solr dirs? Been I while since I was
> weighed
>> down with windows, but that always killed my indexing if I didn't exclude
> my
>> checkout directories.
>>
>> - Mark Miller
>> lucidimagination.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional
>> commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>

- Mark Miller
lucidimagination.com












---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64 #175

Mark Miller-3
Just noticed this seems to happen fairly frequently in the java 7 windows build, but I don't seem to see it in the java 6 windows build.

I'll try and use Java 7 on my win machine when I get chance - should make it easier to experiment with fixes if I can get the same results locally.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64 #175

Dawid Weiss
Let me know if you need any help (or if you have questions) wrt to the
new test infrastructure. I am busy with other things at the moment and
there are rough edges... I plan to jump into it again once we ship a
release (don't know when this going to happen at the moment).

Dawid

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Mark Miller <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Just noticed this seems to happen fairly frequently in the java 7 windows build, but I don't seem to see it in the java 6 windows build.
>
> I'll try and use Java 7 on my win machine when I get chance - should make it easier to experiment with fixes if I can get the same results locally.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64 #175

Mark Miller-3
This def happens more with Java 7 for me. Rather than seeing it like 1 out of 100 at best, it is now happening about 1 out of 20.

Going on vacation for a week, so not sure if I will figure this out anytime soon, but now at least I can try some things and get more rapid and trustable feedback.


> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Mark Miller <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Just noticed this seems to happen fairly frequently in the java 7 windows build, but I don't seem to see it in the java 6 windows build.
>>
>> I'll try and use Java 7 on my win machine when I get chance - should make it easier to experiment with fixes if I can get the same results locally.
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>

- Mark Miller
lucidimagination.com












---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]