DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34193] - [PATCH] Performance improvement to DisjunctionSumScorer

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34193] - [PATCH] Performance improvement to DisjunctionSumScorer

Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG?
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34193>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND?
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34193





------- Additional Comments From [hidden email]  2005-05-22 13:20 -------
Created an attachment (id=15117)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15117&action=view)
Another alternative to BooleanScorer using a Btree

As posted today on java-dev by Karl Wright.

The performance of the unbalanced btree could be compared
to the specialised priority queue.

The code can also be simplified to the disjunction case,
which boils down to adapting from 1.4.3 to the trunk.

Regards,
Paul Elschot


--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]