DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34995] - Contribution: LuceneIndexAccessor

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34995] - Contribution: LuceneIndexAccessor

Bugzilla from bugzilla@apache.org
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG?
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34995>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND?
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34995





------- Additional Comments From [hidden email]  2005-05-21 01:19 -------
Not really a bug. We didn't need something like that "feature" at the time. But
I can't see why it should be impossible to test with a RAMDirectory:

public void testGetWriter() throws IOException {
        Directory directory = new RAMDirectory();
        Analyzer analyzer = new StandardAnalyzer();

        // create initial index
        {
                IndexWriter writer = new IndexWriter(directory, analyzer, true);
                writer.close();
        }
               
        IndexAccessProvider accessProvider = new IndexAccessProvider(directory, analyzer);
        LuceneIndexAccessor accessor = new LuceneIndexAccessor(accessProvider);
        accessor.open();
               
        IndexWriter writer = accessor.getWriter();
        assertNotNull(writer);
        accessor.release(writer);
               
        accessor.close();
}


--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]