Field class in Lucene 1.4.3 & Lucene 2.0.0

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Field class in Lucene 1.4.3 & Lucene 2.0.0

Vikas Khengare
Hi Friends

 

            I was using Lucene 1.4.3 But Now I am using Lucene 2.0.0.

The First Problem arise is that in Lucene I was using

doc.add (Field.Keyword(FIELD_URL, item.uri));

doc.add (Field.Text(FIELD_OBJNAME, item.ObjName));

doc.add (Field.UnStored(FIELD_ALLDOCS, item.allConcat));

 

But Now in Lucene 2.0.0 I don't have that facility

So instead of that why should I do?

 

I want Keyword field to maintain uniqueness in Index. OW what should I
do to maintain Uniqueness in Index by using Lucene 2.0.0 ?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Field class in Lucene 1.4.3 & Lucene 2.0.0

Erik Hatcher
Have a look at the CHANGES.txt file.  First try upgrading to Lucene  
1.9.x and then ensuring all the deprecation warnings are gone from  
compilation, then you can cleanly go to 2.0.

        Erik



On Jun 16, 2006, at 4:35 AM, Vikas Khengare wrote:

> Hi Friends
>
>
>
>             I was using Lucene 1.4.3 But Now I am using Lucene 2.0.0.
>
> The First Problem arise is that in Lucene I was using
>
> doc.add (Field.Keyword(FIELD_URL, item.uri));
>
> doc.add (Field.Text(FIELD_OBJNAME, item.ObjName));
>
> doc.add (Field.UnStored(FIELD_ALLDOCS, item.allConcat));
>
>
>
> But Now in Lucene 2.0.0 I don't have that facility
>
> So instead of that why should I do?
>
>
>
> I want Keyword field to maintain uniqueness in Index. OW what should I
> do to maintain Uniqueness in Index by using Lucene 2.0.0 ?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]