Fwd: [Rails] Ruby/Odeum vs. Lucene: Part 2

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Fwd: [Rails] Ruby/Odeum vs. Lucene: Part 2

Erik Hatcher
FYI...

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Zed A. Shaw" <[hidden email]>
> Date: May 30, 2005 9:34:09 PM EDT
> To: Ruby On Rails List <[hidden email]>
> Subject: [Rails] Ruby/Odeum vs. Lucene: Part 2
> Reply-To: [hidden email], [hidden email]
>
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Just wanted to send out an update on my recent Ruby/Odeum vs. Lucene
> performance analysis.
>
> http://www.zedshaw.com/projects/ruby_odeum/odeum_lucene_part2.html
>
> This analysis is much more detailed, covers a consistent analysis
> method, and is probably really really boring for most people.  Lots of
> pretty graphs and tables of data.  There is an Executive Summary for
> people who are not interested in the full details.  The gist of the
> analysis is that Ruby/Odeum is slower than Lucene, but uses a lot less
> memory.
>
> I'm interested in grammar corrections, questions about terminology,  
> and
> other comments.  Please send me your comments rather than the list  
> as I
> think most people would consider grammar corrections off-topic.  I'll
> give everyone who comments credit on the essay (with links to your  
> blog
> or site).
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
> Zed A. Shaw
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>