[JENKINS] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1835 - Failure

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[JENKINS] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1835 - Failure

Apache Jenkins Server-2
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-trunk/1835/

1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:  org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermVectors.testKnownSetOfDocuments

Error Message:
null

Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:165)
        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:57)
        at org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermVectors.testKnownSetOfDocuments(TestTermVectors.java:259)
        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:705)
        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:604)
        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:509)
        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$RememberThreadRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:567)




Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 13502 lines...]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1835 - Failure

Robert Muir
Both ParallelAtomicReader and this test are buggy in my opinion :)

On one hand, the test should realize that fieldsEnum might return
fields where terms is null (FieldsEnum documents this!)

On the other hand, ParallelAtomicReader shouldn't add non-indexed
fields into its map, because thats wasteful:

Index: src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java
===================================================================
--- src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java (revision
1291672)
+++ src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java (working copy)
@@ -105,8 +105,10 @@
         // NOTE: first reader having a given field "wins":
         if (!fieldToReader.containsKey(fieldInfo.name)) {
           fieldInfos.add(fieldInfo);
-          fieldToReader.put(fieldInfo.name, reader);
-          this.fields.addField(fieldInfo.name, reader.terms(fieldInfo.name));
+          if (fieldInfo.isIndexed) {
+            fieldToReader.put(fieldInfo.name, reader);
+            this.fields.addField(fieldInfo.name, reader.terms(fieldInfo.name));
+          }
         }
       }
     }



On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-trunk/1835/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> REGRESSION:  org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermVectors.testKnownSetOfDocuments
>
> Error Message:
> null
>
> Stack Trace:
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:165)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:57)
>        at org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermVectors.testKnownSetOfDocuments(TestTermVectors.java:259)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:705)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:604)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:509)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$RememberThreadRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:567)
>
>
>
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 13502 lines...]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]



--
lucidimagination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1835 - Failure

Robert Muir
ok fieldToReader is used for other things, ill modify the patch to
just not add to 'fields'. Thats what counts here.

As far as the test, since its only doing a basic add of documents the
"bogus" assert maybe should stay?
I dont see any reason why its fieldsEnum should get fields with empty
terms for this test, but at least ill add a comment.

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Robert Muir <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Both ParallelAtomicReader and this test are buggy in my opinion :)
>
> On one hand, the test should realize that fieldsEnum might return
> fields where terms is null (FieldsEnum documents this!)
>
> On the other hand, ParallelAtomicReader shouldn't add non-indexed
> fields into its map, because thats wasteful:
>
> Index: src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java
> ===================================================================
> --- src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java  (revision
> 1291672)
> +++ src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java  (working copy)
> @@ -105,8 +105,10 @@
>         // NOTE: first reader having a given field "wins":
>         if (!fieldToReader.containsKey(fieldInfo.name)) {
>           fieldInfos.add(fieldInfo);
> -          fieldToReader.put(fieldInfo.name, reader);
> -          this.fields.addField(fieldInfo.name, reader.terms(fieldInfo.name));
> +          if (fieldInfo.isIndexed) {
> +            fieldToReader.put(fieldInfo.name, reader);
> +            this.fields.addField(fieldInfo.name, reader.terms(fieldInfo.name));
> +          }
>         }
>       }
>     }
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-trunk/1835/
>>
>> 1 tests failed.
>> REGRESSION:  org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermVectors.testKnownSetOfDocuments
>>
>> Error Message:
>> null
>>
>> Stack Trace:
>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:165)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:57)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermVectors.testKnownSetOfDocuments(TestTermVectors.java:259)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:705)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:604)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:509)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$RememberThreadRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:567)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Build Log (for compile errors):
>> [...truncated 13502 lines...]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
>
> --
> lucidimagination.com



--
lucidimagination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: [JENKINS] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1835 - Failure

Uwe Schindler
In reply to this post by Robert Muir
I am fine with the ParallelAtomic patch, only populate fieldsToReader for all fields, as its also used for docvalues (and term vectors, but those are only valid for indexed fields).

Uwe

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [hidden email]


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Muir [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 10:50 AM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1835 - Failure
>
> Both ParallelAtomicReader and this test are buggy in my opinion :)
>
> On one hand, the test should realize that fieldsEnum might return fields where
> terms is null (FieldsEnum documents this!)
>
> On the other hand, ParallelAtomicReader shouldn't add non-indexed fields into
> its map, because thats wasteful:
>
> Index: src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java
> ================================================================
> ===
> --- src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java
> (revision
> 1291672)
> +++ src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java
> (working copy)
> @@ -105,8 +105,10 @@
>          // NOTE: first reader having a given field "wins":
>          if (!fieldToReader.containsKey(fieldInfo.name)) {
>            fieldInfos.add(fieldInfo);
> -          fieldToReader.put(fieldInfo.name, reader);
> -          this.fields.addField(fieldInfo.name, reader.terms(fieldInfo.name));
> +          if (fieldInfo.isIndexed) {
> +            fieldToReader.put(fieldInfo.name, reader);
> +            this.fields.addField(fieldInfo.name, reader.terms(fieldInfo.name));
> +          }
>          }
>        }
>      }
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-trunk/1835/
> >
> > 1 tests failed.
> > REGRESSION:
> > org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermVectors.testKnownSetOfDocuments
> >
> > Error Message:
> > null
> >
> > Stack Trace:
> > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
> >        at
> > org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRun
> > ner.java:165)
> >        at
> > org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRun
> > ner.java:57)
> >        at
> > org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermVectors.testKnownSetOfDocuments(TestT
> > ermVectors.java:259)
> >        at
> > org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.eval
> > uate(LuceneTestCase.java:705)
> >        at
> > org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.eval
> > uate(LuceneTestCase.java:604)
> >        at
> > org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.eval
> > uate(LuceneTestCase.java:509)
> >        at
> > org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$RememberThreadRule$1.evaluate(Lu
> > ceneTestCase.java:567)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Build Log (for compile errors):
> > [...truncated 13502 lines...]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For
> > additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
>
> --
> lucidimagination.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional
> commands, e-mail: [hidden email]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: [JENKINS] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1835 - Failure

Uwe Schindler
In reply to this post by Robert Muir
There is another bug in ParallelAtomicReader with term vectors: It should return null, if no vectors are available, but it returns an empty fields instance instead.

Fix is here:

Index: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java
===================================================================
--- lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java (revision 1291680)
+++ lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java (working copy)
@@ -237,11 +237,14 @@
   @Override
   public Fields getTermVectors(int docID) throws IOException {
     ensureOpen();
-    ParallelFields fields = new ParallelFields();
+    ParallelFields fields = null;
     for (Map.Entry<String,AtomicReader> ent : fieldToReader.entrySet()) {
       String fieldName = ent.getKey();
       Terms vector = ent.getValue().getTermVector(docID, fieldName);
       if (vector != null) {
+        if (fields == null) {
+          fields = new ParallelFields();
+        }
         fields.addField(fieldName, vector);
       }
     }

Committing...

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [hidden email]


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Muir [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 10:58 AM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1835 - Failure
>
> ok fieldToReader is used for other things, ill modify the patch to just not add to
> 'fields'. Thats what counts here.
>
> As far as the test, since its only doing a basic add of documents the "bogus"
> assert maybe should stay?
> I dont see any reason why its fieldsEnum should get fields with empty terms for
> this test, but at least ill add a comment.
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Robert Muir <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Both ParallelAtomicReader and this test are buggy in my opinion :)
> >
> > On one hand, the test should realize that fieldsEnum might return
> > fields where terms is null (FieldsEnum documents this!)
> >
> > On the other hand, ParallelAtomicReader shouldn't add non-indexed
> > fields into its map, because thats wasteful:
> >
> > Index: src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java
> >
> ================================================================
> ===
> > --- src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java
> > (revision
> > 1291672)
> > +++ src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java
> > +++ (working copy)
> > @@ -105,8 +105,10 @@
> >         // NOTE: first reader having a given field "wins":
> >         if (!fieldToReader.containsKey(fieldInfo.name)) {
> >           fieldInfos.add(fieldInfo);
> > -          fieldToReader.put(fieldInfo.name, reader);
> > -          this.fields.addField(fieldInfo.name,
> > reader.terms(fieldInfo.name));
> > +          if (fieldInfo.isIndexed) {
> > +            fieldToReader.put(fieldInfo.name, reader);
> > +            this.fields.addField(fieldInfo.name,
> > + reader.terms(fieldInfo.name));
> > +          }
> >         }
> >       }
> >     }
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
> > <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-trunk/1835/
> >>
> >> 1 tests failed.
> >> REGRESSION:
> >> org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermVectors.testKnownSetOfDocuments
> >>
> >> Error Message:
> >> null
> >>
> >> Stack Trace:
> >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
> >>        at
> >> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRu
> >> nner.java:165)
> >>        at
> >> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRu
> >> nner.java:57)
> >>        at
> >> org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermVectors.testKnownSetOfDocuments(Test
> >> TermVectors.java:259)
> >>        at
> >> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.eva
> >> luate(LuceneTestCase.java:705)
> >>        at
> >> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.eva
> >> luate(LuceneTestCase.java:604)
> >>        at
> >> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.eva
> >> luate(LuceneTestCase.java:509)
> >>        at
> >> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$RememberThreadRule$1.evaluate(L
> >> uceneTestCase.java:567)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Build Log (for compile errors):
> >> [...truncated 13502 lines...]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For
> >> additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
> --
> lucidimagination.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional
> commands, e-mail: [hidden email]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1835 - Failure

Robert Muir
Yes, lets do this.

because the indexreader API says it WILL return null if there are no vectors.

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:11 AM, Uwe Schindler <[hidden email]> wrote:

> There is another bug in ParallelAtomicReader with term vectors: It should return null, if no vectors are available, but it returns an empty fields instance instead.
>
> Fix is here:
>
> Index: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java
> ===================================================================
> --- lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java      (revision 1291680)
> +++ lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java      (working copy)
> @@ -237,11 +237,14 @@
>   @Override
>   public Fields getTermVectors(int docID) throws IOException {
>     ensureOpen();
> -    ParallelFields fields = new ParallelFields();
> +    ParallelFields fields = null;
>     for (Map.Entry<String,AtomicReader> ent : fieldToReader.entrySet()) {
>       String fieldName = ent.getKey();
>       Terms vector = ent.getValue().getTermVector(docID, fieldName);
>       if (vector != null) {
> +        if (fields == null) {
> +          fields = new ParallelFields();
> +        }
>         fields.addField(fieldName, vector);
>       }
>     }
>
> Committing...
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: [hidden email]
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Robert Muir [mailto:[hidden email]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 10:58 AM
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1835 - Failure
>>
>> ok fieldToReader is used for other things, ill modify the patch to just not add to
>> 'fields'. Thats what counts here.
>>
>> As far as the test, since its only doing a basic add of documents the "bogus"
>> assert maybe should stay?
>> I dont see any reason why its fieldsEnum should get fields with empty terms for
>> this test, but at least ill add a comment.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Robert Muir <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > Both ParallelAtomicReader and this test are buggy in my opinion :)
>> >
>> > On one hand, the test should realize that fieldsEnum might return
>> > fields where terms is null (FieldsEnum documents this!)
>> >
>> > On the other hand, ParallelAtomicReader shouldn't add non-indexed
>> > fields into its map, because thats wasteful:
>> >
>> > Index: src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java
>> >
>> ================================================================
>> ===
>> > --- src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java
>> > (revision
>> > 1291672)
>> > +++ src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelAtomicReader.java
>> > +++ (working copy)
>> > @@ -105,8 +105,10 @@
>> >         // NOTE: first reader having a given field "wins":
>> >         if (!fieldToReader.containsKey(fieldInfo.name)) {
>> >           fieldInfos.add(fieldInfo);
>> > -          fieldToReader.put(fieldInfo.name, reader);
>> > -          this.fields.addField(fieldInfo.name,
>> > reader.terms(fieldInfo.name));
>> > +          if (fieldInfo.isIndexed) {
>> > +            fieldToReader.put(fieldInfo.name, reader);
>> > +            this.fields.addField(fieldInfo.name,
>> > + reader.terms(fieldInfo.name));
>> > +          }
>> >         }
>> >       }
>> >     }
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
>> > <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-trunk/1835/
>> >>
>> >> 1 tests failed.
>> >> REGRESSION:
>> >> org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermVectors.testKnownSetOfDocuments
>> >>
>> >> Error Message:
>> >> null
>> >>
>> >> Stack Trace:
>> >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
>> >>        at
>> >> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRu
>> >> nner.java:165)
>> >>        at
>> >> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRu
>> >> nner.java:57)
>> >>        at
>> >> org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermVectors.testKnownSetOfDocuments(Test
>> >> TermVectors.java:259)
>> >>        at
>> >> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.eva
>> >> luate(LuceneTestCase.java:705)
>> >>        at
>> >> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.eva
>> >> luate(LuceneTestCase.java:604)
>> >>        at
>> >> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.eva
>> >> luate(LuceneTestCase.java:509)
>> >>        at
>> >> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$RememberThreadRule$1.evaluate(L
>> >> uceneTestCase.java:567)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Build Log (for compile errors):
>> >> [...truncated 13502 lines...]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For
>> >> additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > lucidimagination.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> lucidimagination.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional
>> commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>



--
lucidimagination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[JENKINS] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1836 - Still Failing

Apache Jenkins Server-2
In reply to this post by Apache Jenkins Server-2
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-trunk/1836/

1 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.fst.FSTCompletionTest.testMultilingualInput

Error Message:
expected:<[74 68 72 65 65 62 79 74 65 f0 a4 ad a2 63 68 61 72]> but was:<threebytechar>

Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<[74 68 72 65 65 62 79 74 65 f0 a4 ad a2 63 68 61 72]> but was:<threebytechar>
        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:165)
        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:57)
        at org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.fst.FSTCompletionTest.testMultilingualInput(FSTCompletionTest.java:187)
        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:707)
        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:606)
        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:511)
        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$RememberThreadRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:569)




Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 16827 lines...]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1836 - Still Failing

Simon Willnauer
I committed a fix - test bug...

simon

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Apache Jenkins Server <[hidden email]> wrote:
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-trunk/1836/

1 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.fst.FSTCompletionTest.testMultilingualInput

Error Message:
expected:<[74 68 72 65 65 62 79 74 65 f0 a4 ad a2 63 68 61 72]> but was:<threebytechar>

Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<[74 68 72 65 65 62 79 74 65 f0 a4 ad a2 63 68 61 72]> but was:<threebytechar>
       at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:165)
       at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:57)
       at org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.fst.FSTCompletionTest.testMultilingualInput(FSTCompletionTest.java:187)
       at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:707)
       at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:606)
       at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:511)
       at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$RememberThreadRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:569)




Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 16827 lines...]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]