[VOTE] Moving SCM to Git

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
11 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[VOTE] Moving SCM to Git

Mattmann, Chris A (3010)
Hi Everyone,

DISCUSS thread here: http://s.apache.org/wVE

Time to officially VOTE on moving Tika to Git. I’ve made a wiki
page for our SCM explaining how to use Git at Apache, and how to
use it with Github, and how to use it even in a traditional SVN
sense. The page is here:

https://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit


I’ve also linked it from the main wiki page. I took the liberty
of updating the only other 2 pages on the wiki that referenced
SCM with (pending) Git instructions as well:

https://wiki.apache.org/tika/DeveloperResources
https://wiki.apache.org/tika/ReleaseProcess

From the DISCUSS thread it would seem the following members of
the community support this move:

Chris Mattmann
Tyler Palsulich
Bob Paulin
Hong-Thai Nguyen

Oleg Tikhonov
David Meikle


Given the above I’m going to count the above people as +1 in
this VOTE if I don’t hear otherwise.

Nick Burch said he would be more supportive if there was a guide,
so I made one and updated the other wiki docs as above so hopefully
that garners his VOTE.

If you’d like to revise your VOTE or to VOTE for the first time,
please use the ballot below:

[ ] +1 Move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git repos
at the ASF
[ ] +0 Indifferent.
[ ] -1 Don’t move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git
repos at the ASF because..

Of course, given the conversation I am +1 for this.

Thanks for VOTE’ing I’ll leave the VOTE open through next Friday.

Cheers,
Chris

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: [hidden email]
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: [VOTE] Moving SCM to Git

kkrugler
Hi Chris,

I'd be +1, but I don't have the essence of the "Re: git (Was: ASF/GitHub Findings of Fact / Statements of Principles)" thread on the Apache members list clearly in my mind.

Specifically, while that thread was spinning merrily away, there were concerns about immutability when using git.

E.g. one comment was...

> releases must correspond to an immutable tag in a repository on ASF hardware.
>
> "Canonical" is needed for releases, and for IP provenance, so I'd augment the above with a second requirement: for each release tag, we must be able to establish the provenance of all files referenced by that tag.
>
> I believe that is the essence of the Foundation's requirements for version control. Both can be satisfied via svn or git. Git may require external sources to satisfy one or both of those requirements. svn inherently has the first nailed, and is much easier for provenance (there may be edge cases I'm missing offhand, but we know the ICLA/grant associated with each change leading up to the tagged release).

Did it wind up as "projects can experiment with using git for official releases"?

Thanks,

-- Ken

> From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
> Sent: January 1, 2016 8:30:16pm PST
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [VOTE] Moving SCM to Git
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> DISCUSS thread here: http://s.apache.org/wVE
>
> Time to officially VOTE on moving Tika to Git. I’ve made a wiki
> page for our SCM explaining how to use Git at Apache, and how to
> use it with Github, and how to use it even in a traditional SVN
> sense. The page is here:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit
>
>
> I’ve also linked it from the main wiki page. I took the liberty
> of updating the only other 2 pages on the wiki that referenced
> SCM with (pending) Git instructions as well:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/DeveloperResources
> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/ReleaseProcess
>
> From the DISCUSS thread it would seem the following members of
> the community support this move:
>
> Chris Mattmann
> Tyler Palsulich
> Bob Paulin
> Hong-Thai Nguyen
>
> Oleg Tikhonov
> David Meikle
>
>
> Given the above I’m going to count the above people as +1 in
> this VOTE if I don’t hear otherwise.
>
> Nick Burch said he would be more supportive if there was a guide,
> so I made one and updated the other wiki docs as above so hopefully
> that garners his VOTE.
>
> If you’d like to revise your VOTE or to VOTE for the first time,
> please use the ballot below:
>
> [ ] +1 Move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git repos
> at the ASF
> [ ] +0 Indifferent.
> [ ] -1 Don’t move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git
> repos at the ASF because..
>
> Of course, given the conversation I am +1 for this.
>
> Thanks for VOTE’ing I’ll leave the VOTE open through next Friday.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Chief Architect
> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
> Email: [hidden email]
> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>

--------------------------
Ken Krugler
+1 530-210-6378
http://www.scaleunlimited.com
custom big data solutions & training
Hadoop, Cascading, Cassandra & Solr





--------------------------
Ken Krugler
+1 530-210-6378
http://www.scaleunlimited.com
custom big data solutions & training
Hadoop, Cascading, Cassandra & Solr





Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Moving SCM to Git

Mattmann, Chris A (3010)
Hey Ken,

Projects have been using writeable git repos at the ASF since 2009-2010. The recent conversation at the foundation level was - should we allow GitHub as a canonical external repo and more broadly - is this possible in general? The Whimsy project is currently undergoing that experiment and it's going well but nothing official to report yet.

Beyond that - projects can release from and use writeable Git repos. Some projects were getting around history by squashing commits ahead of the repo and getting around infra's checks on master (aka trunk) by using different main branch names but we're not in that boat.

Cheers,
Chris


Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 2, 2016, at 3:47 PM, Ken Krugler <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I'd be +1, but I don't have the essence of the "Re: git (Was: ASF/GitHub Findings of Fact / Statements of Principles)" thread on the Apache members list clearly in my mind.
>
> Specifically, while that thread was spinning merrily away, there were concerns about immutability when using git.
>
> E.g. one comment was...
>
>> releases must correspond to an immutable tag in a repository on ASF hardware.
>>
>> "Canonical" is needed for releases, and for IP provenance, so I'd augment the above with a second requirement: for each release tag, we must be able to establish the provenance of all files referenced by that tag.
>>
>> I believe that is the essence of the Foundation's requirements for version control. Both can be satisfied via svn or git. Git may require external sources to satisfy one or both of those requirements. svn inherently has the first nailed, and is much easier for provenance (there may be edge cases I'm missing offhand, but we know the ICLA/grant associated with each change leading up to the tagged release).
>
> Did it wind up as "projects can experiment with using git for official releases"?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Ken
>
>> From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
>> Sent: January 1, 2016 8:30:16pm PST
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Subject: [VOTE] Moving SCM to Git
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> DISCUSS thread here: http://s.apache.org/wVE
>>
>> Time to officially VOTE on moving Tika to Git. I’ve made a wiki
>> page for our SCM explaining how to use Git at Apache, and how to
>> use it with Github, and how to use it even in a traditional SVN
>> sense. The page is here:
>>
>> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit
>>
>>
>> I’ve also linked it from the main wiki page. I took the liberty
>> of updating the only other 2 pages on the wiki that referenced
>> SCM with (pending) Git instructions as well:
>>
>> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/DeveloperResources
>> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/ReleaseProcess
>>
>> From the DISCUSS thread it would seem the following members of
>> the community support this move:
>>
>> Chris Mattmann
>> Tyler Palsulich
>> Bob Paulin
>> Hong-Thai Nguyen
>>
>> Oleg Tikhonov
>> David Meikle
>>
>>
>> Given the above I’m going to count the above people as +1 in
>> this VOTE if I don’t hear otherwise.
>>
>> Nick Burch said he would be more supportive if there was a guide,
>> so I made one and updated the other wiki docs as above so hopefully
>> that garners his VOTE.
>>
>> If you’d like to revise your VOTE or to VOTE for the first time,
>> please use the ballot below:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git repos
>> at the ASF
>> [ ] +0 Indifferent.
>> [ ] -1 Don’t move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git
>> repos at the ASF because..
>>
>> Of course, given the conversation I am +1 for this.
>>
>> Thanks for VOTE’ing I’ll leave the VOTE open through next Friday.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Chief Architect
>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>> Email: [hidden email]
>> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> --------------------------
> Ken Krugler
> +1 530-210-6378
> http://www.scaleunlimited.com
> custom big data solutions & training
> Hadoop, Cascading, Cassandra & Solr
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------
> Ken Krugler
> +1 530-210-6378
> http://www.scaleunlimited.com
> custom big data solutions & training
> Hadoop, Cascading, Cassandra & Solr
>
>
>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Moving SCM to Git

Mattmann, Chris A (3010)
One final note - this isn't a vote to make GitHub the canonical repo. In the future if Whimsy goes well I'd like to explore that but here I am simply proposing to use the ASF writeable Git repos (which happen to be mirrored to GH).

Cheers,
Chris

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 2, 2016, at 4:31 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hey Ken,
>
> Projects have been using writeable git repos at the ASF since 2009-2010. The recent conversation at the foundation level was - should we allow GitHub as a canonical external repo and more broadly - is this possible in general? The Whimsy project is currently undergoing that experiment and it's going well but nothing official to report yet.
>
> Beyond that - projects can release from and use writeable Git repos. Some projects were getting around history by squashing commits ahead of the repo and getting around infra's checks on master (aka trunk) by using different main branch names but we're not in that boat.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jan 2, 2016, at 3:47 PM, Ken Krugler <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> I'd be +1, but I don't have the essence of the "Re: git (Was: ASF/GitHub Findings of Fact / Statements of Principles)" thread on the Apache members list clearly in my mind.
>>
>> Specifically, while that thread was spinning merrily away, there were concerns about immutability when using git.
>>
>> E.g. one comment was...
>>
>>> releases must correspond to an immutable tag in a repository on ASF hardware.
>>>
>>> "Canonical" is needed for releases, and for IP provenance, so I'd augment the above with a second requirement: for each release tag, we must be able to establish the provenance of all files referenced by that tag.
>>>
>>> I believe that is the essence of the Foundation's requirements for version control. Both can be satisfied via svn or git. Git may require external sources to satisfy one or both of those requirements. svn inherently has the first nailed, and is much easier for provenance (there may be edge cases I'm missing offhand, but we know the ICLA/grant associated with each change leading up to the tagged release).
>>
>> Did it wind up as "projects can experiment with using git for official releases"?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -- Ken
>>
>>> From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
>>> Sent: January 1, 2016 8:30:16pm PST
>>> To: [hidden email]
>>> Subject: [VOTE] Moving SCM to Git
>>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> DISCUSS thread here: http://s.apache.org/wVE
>>>
>>> Time to officially VOTE on moving Tika to Git. I’ve made a wiki
>>> page for our SCM explaining how to use Git at Apache, and how to
>>> use it with Github, and how to use it even in a traditional SVN
>>> sense. The page is here:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit
>>>
>>>
>>> I’ve also linked it from the main wiki page. I took the liberty
>>> of updating the only other 2 pages on the wiki that referenced
>>> SCM with (pending) Git instructions as well:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/DeveloperResources
>>> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/ReleaseProcess
>>>
>>> From the DISCUSS thread it would seem the following members of
>>> the community support this move:
>>>
>>> Chris Mattmann
>>> Tyler Palsulich
>>> Bob Paulin
>>> Hong-Thai Nguyen
>>>
>>> Oleg Tikhonov
>>> David Meikle
>>>
>>>
>>> Given the above I’m going to count the above people as +1 in
>>> this VOTE if I don’t hear otherwise.
>>>
>>> Nick Burch said he would be more supportive if there was a guide,
>>> so I made one and updated the other wiki docs as above so hopefully
>>> that garners his VOTE.
>>>
>>> If you’d like to revise your VOTE or to VOTE for the first time,
>>> please use the ballot below:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git repos
>>> at the ASF
>>> [ ] +0 Indifferent.
>>> [ ] -1 Don’t move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git
>>> repos at the ASF because..
>>>
>>> Of course, given the conversation I am +1 for this.
>>>
>>> Thanks for VOTE’ing I’ll leave the VOTE open through next Friday.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>> Chief Architect
>>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>>> Email: [hidden email]
>>> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> --------------------------
>> Ken Krugler
>> +1 530-210-6378
>> http://www.scaleunlimited.com
>> custom big data solutions & training
>> Hadoop, Cascading, Cassandra & Solr
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------
>> Ken Krugler
>> +1 530-210-6378
>> http://www.scaleunlimited.com
>> custom big data solutions & training
>> Hadoop, Cascading, Cassandra & Solr
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Moving SCM to Git

Tyler Palsulich
Hi,

Just reiterating my +1 for the move. A huge benefit in my eyes is a reduced
barrier to entry for new developers and contributors.

Tyler
On Jan 2, 2016 4:34 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> One final note - this isn't a vote to make GitHub the canonical repo. In
> the future if Whimsy goes well I'd like to explore that but here I am
> simply proposing to use the ASF writeable Git repos (which happen to be
> mirrored to GH).
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jan 2, 2016, at 4:31 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Ken,
> >
> > Projects have been using writeable git repos at the ASF since 2009-2010.
> The recent conversation at the foundation level was - should we allow
> GitHub as a canonical external repo and more broadly - is this possible in
> general? The Whimsy project is currently undergoing that experiment and
> it's going well but nothing official to report yet.
> >
> > Beyond that - projects can release from and use writeable Git repos.
> Some projects were getting around history by squashing commits ahead of the
> repo and getting around infra's checks on master (aka trunk) by using
> different main branch names but we're not in that boat.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On Jan 2, 2016, at 3:47 PM, Ken Krugler <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Chris,
> >>
> >> I'd be +1, but I don't have the essence of the "Re: git (Was:
> ASF/GitHub Findings of Fact / Statements of Principles)" thread on the
> Apache members list clearly in my mind.
> >>
> >> Specifically, while that thread was spinning merrily away, there were
> concerns about immutability when using git.
> >>
> >> E.g. one comment was...
> >>
> >>> releases must correspond to an immutable tag in a repository on ASF
> hardware.
> >>>
> >>> "Canonical" is needed for releases, and for IP provenance, so I'd
> augment the above with a second requirement: for each release tag, we must
> be able to establish the provenance of all files referenced by that tag.
> >>>
> >>> I believe that is the essence of the Foundation's requirements for
> version control. Both can be satisfied via svn or git. Git may require
> external sources to satisfy one or both of those requirements. svn
> inherently has the first nailed, and is much easier for provenance (there
> may be edge cases I'm missing offhand, but we know the ICLA/grant
> associated with each change leading up to the tagged release).
> >>
> >> Did it wind up as "projects can experiment with using git for official
> releases"?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> -- Ken
> >>
> >>> From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
> >>> Sent: January 1, 2016 8:30:16pm PST
> >>> To: [hidden email]
> >>> Subject: [VOTE] Moving SCM to Git
> >>>
> >>> Hi Everyone,
> >>>
> >>> DISCUSS thread here: http://s.apache.org/wVE
> >>>
> >>> Time to officially VOTE on moving Tika to Git. I’ve made a wiki
> >>> page for our SCM explaining how to use Git at Apache, and how to
> >>> use it with Github, and how to use it even in a traditional SVN
> >>> sense. The page is here:
> >>>
> >>> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I’ve also linked it from the main wiki page. I took the liberty
> >>> of updating the only other 2 pages on the wiki that referenced
> >>> SCM with (pending) Git instructions as well:
> >>>
> >>> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/DeveloperResources
> >>> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/ReleaseProcess
> >>>
> >>> From the DISCUSS thread it would seem the following members of
> >>> the community support this move:
> >>>
> >>> Chris Mattmann
> >>> Tyler Palsulich
> >>> Bob Paulin
> >>> Hong-Thai Nguyen
> >>>
> >>> Oleg Tikhonov
> >>> David Meikle
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Given the above I’m going to count the above people as +1 in
> >>> this VOTE if I don’t hear otherwise.
> >>>
> >>> Nick Burch said he would be more supportive if there was a guide,
> >>> so I made one and updated the other wiki docs as above so hopefully
> >>> that garners his VOTE.
> >>>
> >>> If you’d like to revise your VOTE or to VOTE for the first time,
> >>> please use the ballot below:
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git repos
> >>> at the ASF
> >>> [ ] +0 Indifferent.
> >>> [ ] -1 Don’t move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git
> >>> repos at the ASF because..
> >>>
> >>> Of course, given the conversation I am +1 for this.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for VOTE’ing I’ll leave the VOTE open through next Friday.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Chris
> >>>
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> >>> Chief Architect
> >>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
> >>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> >>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
> >>> Email: [hidden email]
> >>> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> >>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>
> >> --------------------------
> >> Ken Krugler
> >> +1 530-210-6378
> >> http://www.scaleunlimited.com
> >> custom big data solutions & training
> >> Hadoop, Cascading, Cassandra & Solr
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --------------------------
> >> Ken Krugler
> >> +1 530-210-6378
> >> http://www.scaleunlimited.com
> >> custom big data solutions & training
> >> Hadoop, Cascading, Cassandra & Solr
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Moving SCM to Git

lewis john mcgibbney
In reply to this post by Mattmann, Chris A (3010)
[X] +1 Move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git repos
at the ASF

On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 7:40 PM, <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
>
> DISCUSS thread here: http://s.apache.org/wVE
>
> Time to officially VOTE on moving Tika to Git. I’ve made a wiki
> page for our SCM explaining how to use Git at Apache, and how to
> use it with Github, and how to use it even in a traditional SVN
> sense. The page is here:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit
>
>
> I’ve also linked it from the main wiki page. I took the liberty
> of updating the only other 2 pages on the wiki that referenced
> SCM with (pending) Git instructions as well:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/DeveloperResources
> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/ReleaseProcess
>
> From the DISCUSS thread it would seem the following members of
> the community support this move:
>
> Chris Mattmann
> Tyler Palsulich
> Bob Paulin
> Hong-Thai Nguyen
>
> Oleg Tikhonov
> David Meikle
>
>
> Given the above I’m going to count the above people as +1 in
> this VOTE if I don’t hear otherwise.
>
> Nick Burch said he would be more supportive if there was a guide,
> so I made one and updated the other wiki docs as above so hopefully
> that garners his VOTE.
>
> If you’d like to revise your VOTE or to VOTE for the first time,
> please use the ballot below:
>
> [ ] +1 Move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git repos
> at the ASF
> [ ] +0 Indifferent.
> [ ] -1 Don’t move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git
> repos at the ASF because..
>
> Of course, given the conversation I am +1 for this.
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: [VOTE] Moving SCM to Git

Allison, Timothy B.
In reply to this post by Mattmann, Chris A (3010)
+1

Thank you, Chris, for moving forward on this!

-----Original Message-----
From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980) [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2016 11:30 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [VOTE] Moving SCM to Git

Hi Everyone,

DISCUSS thread here: http://s.apache.org/wVE

Time to officially VOTE on moving Tika to Git. I’ve made a wiki page for our SCM explaining how to use Git at Apache, and how to use it with Github, and how to use it even in a traditional SVN sense. The page is here:

https://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit


I’ve also linked it from the main wiki page. I took the liberty of updating the only other 2 pages on the wiki that referenced SCM with (pending) Git instructions as well:

https://wiki.apache.org/tika/DeveloperResources
https://wiki.apache.org/tika/ReleaseProcess

From the DISCUSS thread it would seem the following members of the community support this move:

Chris Mattmann
Tyler Palsulich
Bob Paulin
Hong-Thai Nguyen

Oleg Tikhonov
David Meikle


Given the above I’m going to count the above people as +1 in this VOTE if I don’t hear otherwise.

Nick Burch said he would be more supportive if there was a guide, so I made one and updated the other wiki docs as above so hopefully that garners his VOTE.

If you’d like to revise your VOTE or to VOTE for the first time, please use the ballot below:

[ ] +1 Move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git repos at the ASF [ ] +0 Indifferent.
[ ] -1 Don’t move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git repos at the ASF because..

Of course, given the conversation I am +1 for this.

Thanks for VOTE’ing I’ll leave the VOTE open through next Friday.

Cheers,
Chris

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: [hidden email]
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: [VOTE] Moving SCM to Git

kkrugler
In reply to this post by Mattmann, Chris A (3010)
+1

-- Ken

> From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
> Sent: January 1, 2016 8:30:16pm PST
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [VOTE] Moving SCM to Git
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> DISCUSS thread here: http://s.apache.org/wVE
>
> Time to officially VOTE on moving Tika to Git. I’ve made a wiki
> page for our SCM explaining how to use Git at Apache, and how to
> use it with Github, and how to use it even in a traditional SVN
> sense. The page is here:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit
>
>
> I’ve also linked it from the main wiki page. I took the liberty
> of updating the only other 2 pages on the wiki that referenced
> SCM with (pending) Git instructions as well:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/DeveloperResources
> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/ReleaseProcess
>
> From the DISCUSS thread it would seem the following members of
> the community support this move:
>
> Chris Mattmann
> Tyler Palsulich
> Bob Paulin
> Hong-Thai Nguyen
>
> Oleg Tikhonov
> David Meikle
>
>
> Given the above I’m going to count the above people as +1 in
> this VOTE if I don’t hear otherwise.
>
> Nick Burch said he would be more supportive if there was a guide,
> so I made one and updated the other wiki docs as above so hopefully
> that garners his VOTE.
>
> If you’d like to revise your VOTE or to VOTE for the first time,
> please use the ballot below:
>
> [ ] +1 Move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git repos
> at the ASF
> [ ] +0 Indifferent.
> [ ] -1 Don’t move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git
> repos at the ASF because..
>
> Of course, given the conversation I am +1 for this.
>
> Thanks for VOTE’ing I’ll leave the VOTE open through next Friday.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Chief Architect
> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
> Email: [hidden email]
> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>

--------------------------
Ken Krugler
+1 530-210-6378
http://www.scaleunlimited.com
custom big data solutions & training
Hadoop, Cascading, Cassandra & Solr





--------------------------
Ken Krugler
+1 530-210-6378
http://www.scaleunlimited.com
custom big data solutions & training
Hadoop, Cascading, Cassandra & Solr





Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Moving SCM to Git

Nick Burch-3
In reply to this post by Mattmann, Chris A (3010)
On 02/01/16 04:30, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:

> Hi Everyone,
>
> DISCUSS thread here: http://s.apache.org/wVE
>
> Time to officially VOTE on moving Tika to Git. I’ve made a wiki
> page for our SCM explaining how to use Git at Apache, and how to
> use it with Github, and how to use it even in a traditional SVN
> sense. The page is here:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/DeveloperResources
> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/ReleaseProcess

Thanks for all those docs! Looks fine to me, at first glance, and we can
fix anything else as we go along :)

> If you’d like to revise your VOTE or to VOTE for the first time,
> please use the ballot below:
>
> [ ] +1 Move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git repos
> at the ASF

+1 from me now

Nick
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Moving SCM to Git

Konstantin Gribov
Hi.

[x] +1 Move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git repos
at the ASF
[ ] +0 Indifferent.
[ ] -1 Don’t move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git
repos at the ASF because..

For me git is more convenient (and I actually use git-svn for svn repos).

пн, 11 янв. 2016 г. в 19:32, Nick Burch <[hidden email]>:

> On 02/01/16 04:30, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > DISCUSS thread here: http://s.apache.org/wVE
> >
> > Time to officially VOTE on moving Tika to Git. I’ve made a wiki
> > page for our SCM explaining how to use Git at Apache, and how to
> > use it with Github, and how to use it even in a traditional SVN
> > sense. The page is here:
> >
> > https://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit
> >
> > https://wiki.apache.org/tika/DeveloperResources
> > https://wiki.apache.org/tika/ReleaseProcess
>
> Thanks for all those docs! Looks fine to me, at first glance, and we can
> fix anything else as we go along :)
>
> > If you’d like to revise your VOTE or to VOTE for the first time,
> > please use the ballot below:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git repos
> > at the ASF
>
> +1 from me now
>
> Nick
>
--
Best regards,
Konstantin Gribov
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Moving SCM to Git

Julien Nioche-4
In reply to this post by Mattmann, Chris A (3010)
+1

On 2 January 2016 at 04:30, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Everyone,
>
> DISCUSS thread here: http://s.apache.org/wVE
>
> Time to officially VOTE on moving Tika to Git. I’ve made a wiki
> page for our SCM explaining how to use Git at Apache, and how to
> use it with Github, and how to use it even in a traditional SVN
> sense. The page is here:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/UsingGit
>
>
> I’ve also linked it from the main wiki page. I took the liberty
> of updating the only other 2 pages on the wiki that referenced
> SCM with (pending) Git instructions as well:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/DeveloperResources
> https://wiki.apache.org/tika/ReleaseProcess
>
> From the DISCUSS thread it would seem the following members of
> the community support this move:
>
> Chris Mattmann
> Tyler Palsulich
> Bob Paulin
> Hong-Thai Nguyen
>
> Oleg Tikhonov
> David Meikle
>
>
> Given the above I’m going to count the above people as +1 in
> this VOTE if I don’t hear otherwise.
>
> Nick Burch said he would be more supportive if there was a guide,
> so I made one and updated the other wiki docs as above so hopefully
> that garners his VOTE.
>
> If you’d like to revise your VOTE or to VOTE for the first time,
> please use the ballot below:
>
> [ ] +1 Move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git repos
> at the ASF
> [ ] +0 Indifferent.
> [ ] -1 Don’t move the Apache Tika source control to Writeable Git
> repos at the ASF because..
>
> Of course, given the conversation I am +1 for this.
>
> Thanks for VOTE’ing I’ll leave the VOTE open through next Friday.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Chief Architect
> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
> Email: [hidden email]
> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
>


--

*Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*

http://www.digitalpebble.com
http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
#digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>