[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
17 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Anshum Gupta
Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.

Artifacts:

Smoke tester:



Here's my +1:

SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]

--
Anshum Gupta
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Shai Erera
When I ran the smoke tester for the first time, I encountered this test failure:

[junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.security.TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin
[junit4] 2> Creating dataDir: /tmp/smoke_lucene_5.5.1_c08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58_3/unpack/solr-5.5.1/solr/build/solr-core/test/J3/temp/solr.security.TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin_4643E7DFA3C28AD5-001/init-core-data-001
[junit4] 2> 48028 INFO (SUITE-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]-worker) [ ] o.a.s.SolrTestCaseJ4 Randomized ssl (true) and clientAuth (false)
[junit4] 2> 48031 INFO (TEST-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]) [ ] o.a.s.SolrTestCaseJ4 ###Starting test
[junit4] 2> 48323 ERROR (TEST-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]) [ ] o.a.s.s.PKIAuthenticationPlugin No SolrAuth header present
[junit4] 2> 48377 ERROR (TEST-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]) [ ] o.a.s.s.PKIAuthenticationPlugin Invalid key
[junit4] 2> 48377 INFO (TEST-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]) [ ] o.a.s.SolrTestCaseJ4 ###Ending test
[junit4] 2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test -Dtestcase=TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin -Dtests.method=test -Dtests.seed=4643E7DFA3C28AD5 -Dtests.locale=ja-JP -Dtests.timezone=Australia/Lindeman -Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII
[junit4] ERROR 0.35s J3 | TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test <<<
[junit4] > Throwable #1: java.lang.NullPointerException
[junit4] > at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([4643E7DFA3C28AD5:CE17D8050D3EE72D]:0)
[junit4] > at org.apache.solr.security.TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test(TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.java:156)
[junit4] > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
[junit4] 2> 48379 INFO (SUITE-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]-worker) [ ] o.a.s.SolrTestCaseJ4 ###deleteCore
[junit4] 2> NOTE: leaving temporary files on disk at: /tmp/smoke_lucene_5.5.1_c08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58_3/unpack/solr-5.5.1/solr/build/solr-core/test/J3/temp/solr.security.TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin_4643E7DFA3C28AD5-001
[junit4] 2> NOTE: test params are: codec=Asserting(Lucene54): {}, docValues:{}, sim=DefaultSimilarity, locale=ja-JP, timezone=Australia/Lindeman
[junit4] 2> NOTE: Linux 4.2.0-30-generic amd64/Oracle Corporation 1.7.0_80 (64-bit)/cpus=8,threads=1,free=161219560,total=432537600
[junit4] 2> NOTE: All tests run in this JVM: [TestAtomicUpdateErrorCases, TestDefaultStatsCache, TestFiltering, PluginInfoTest, HdfsWriteToMultipleCollectionsTest, DistributedFacetPivotSmallAdvancedTest, ConnectionManagerTest, TestJoin, ShardRoutingTest, WrapperMergePolicyFactoryTest, IndexSchemaRuntimeFieldTest, TestClassNameShortening, SimpleCollectionCreateDeleteTest, TestManagedResource, BigEndianAscendingWordDeserializerTest, HdfsRestartWhileUpdatingTest, TestSolrDeletionPolicy1, TestConfigReload, TestSolrJ, TestIndexingPerformance, TestInitQParser, AlternateDirectoryTest, TestConfigOverlay, TestCSVResponseWriter, SpatialRPTFieldTypeTest, SolrIndexSplitterTest, DistributedVersionInfoTest, TestSmileRequest, TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin]

Second time it passed. I didn't have time to dig into the failure, so I can't tell if it should hold off the release. What do you think?

Shai

On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 12:26 AM Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.

Artifacts:

Smoke tester:



Here's my +1:

SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]


--
Anshum Gupta
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Anshum Gupta
I can't reproduce that failure even with the seed. I don't think it's a blocker and we should be good to go.

@Noble: Considering you have a better grip on this test, can you confirm ?

I think we should track this in a JIRA. Perhaps just an epic with sub-tasks about failing tests is what we need right now to get a grip on the tests situation.

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Shai Erera <[hidden email]> wrote:
When I ran the smoke tester for the first time, I encountered this test failure:

[junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.security.TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin
[junit4] 2> Creating dataDir: /tmp/smoke_lucene_5.5.1_c08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58_3/unpack/solr-5.5.1/solr/build/solr-core/test/J3/temp/solr.security.TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin_4643E7DFA3C28AD5-001/init-core-data-001
[junit4] 2> 48028 INFO (SUITE-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]-worker) [ ] o.a.s.SolrTestCaseJ4 Randomized ssl (true) and clientAuth (false)
[junit4] 2> 48031 INFO (TEST-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]) [ ] o.a.s.SolrTestCaseJ4 ###Starting test
[junit4] 2> 48323 ERROR (TEST-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]) [ ] o.a.s.s.PKIAuthenticationPlugin No SolrAuth header present
[junit4] 2> 48377 ERROR (TEST-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]) [ ] o.a.s.s.PKIAuthenticationPlugin Invalid key
[junit4] 2> 48377 INFO (TEST-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]) [ ] o.a.s.SolrTestCaseJ4 ###Ending test
[junit4] 2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test -Dtestcase=TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin -Dtests.method=test -Dtests.seed=4643E7DFA3C28AD5 -Dtests.locale=ja-JP -Dtests.timezone=Australia/Lindeman -Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII
[junit4] ERROR 0.35s J3 | TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test <<<
[junit4] > Throwable #1: java.lang.NullPointerException
[junit4] > at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([4643E7DFA3C28AD5:CE17D8050D3EE72D]:0)
[junit4] > at org.apache.solr.security.TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.test(TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin.java:156)
[junit4] > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
[junit4] 2> 48379 INFO (SUITE-TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin-seed#[4643E7DFA3C28AD5]-worker) [ ] o.a.s.SolrTestCaseJ4 ###deleteCore
[junit4] 2> NOTE: leaving temporary files on disk at: /tmp/smoke_lucene_5.5.1_c08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58_3/unpack/solr-5.5.1/solr/build/solr-core/test/J3/temp/solr.security.TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin_4643E7DFA3C28AD5-001
[junit4] 2> NOTE: test params are: codec=Asserting(Lucene54): {}, docValues:{}, sim=DefaultSimilarity, locale=ja-JP, timezone=Australia/Lindeman
[junit4] 2> NOTE: Linux 4.2.0-30-generic amd64/Oracle Corporation 1.7.0_80 (64-bit)/cpus=8,threads=1,free=161219560,total=432537600
[junit4] 2> NOTE: All tests run in this JVM: [TestAtomicUpdateErrorCases, TestDefaultStatsCache, TestFiltering, PluginInfoTest, HdfsWriteToMultipleCollectionsTest, DistributedFacetPivotSmallAdvancedTest, ConnectionManagerTest, TestJoin, ShardRoutingTest, WrapperMergePolicyFactoryTest, IndexSchemaRuntimeFieldTest, TestClassNameShortening, SimpleCollectionCreateDeleteTest, TestManagedResource, BigEndianAscendingWordDeserializerTest, HdfsRestartWhileUpdatingTest, TestSolrDeletionPolicy1, TestConfigReload, TestSolrJ, TestIndexingPerformance, TestInitQParser, AlternateDirectoryTest, TestConfigOverlay, TestCSVResponseWriter, SpatialRPTFieldTypeTest, SolrIndexSplitterTest, DistributedVersionInfoTest, TestSmileRequest, TestPKIAuthenticationPlugin]

Second time it passed. I didn't have time to dig into the failure, so I can't tell if it should hold off the release. What do you think?

Shai

On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 12:26 AM Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.

Artifacts:

Smoke tester:



Here's my +1:

SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]


--
Anshum Gupta



--
Anshum Gupta
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Timothy Potter
In reply to this post by Anshum Gupta
+1 SUCCESS! [0:51:00.367685]

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
>
> Artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>
> Smoke tester:
>
>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

sarowe
In reply to this post by Anshum Gupta
+1

Docs, changes and javadocs look good.

The smoke tester passed for me (with java8): SUCCESS! [0:45:46.037606]

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On Apr 30, 2016, at 5:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
>
> Artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>
> Smoke tester:
>
>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Yonik Seeley
In reply to this post by Anshum Gupta
+1

-Yonik


On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
>
> Artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>
> Smoke tester:
>
>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Noble Paul നോബിള്‍  नोब्ळ्
I shall dig into this

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Yonik Seeley <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1

-Yonik


On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
>
> Artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>
> Smoke tester:
>
>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]




--
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Noble Paul നോബിള്‍  नोब्ळ्
I couldn't reproduce it with repeated runs. This is a mock test and the failure says , "no SolrAuth header present, which will not happen in a real test. it has to be something with the mock itself. This should not hold up the release

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Noble Paul <[hidden email]> wrote:
I shall dig into this

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Yonik Seeley <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1

-Yonik


On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.
>
> Artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>
> Smoke tester:
>
>   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58
>
>
> Here's my +1:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]




--
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul



--
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Anshum Gupta
In reply to this post by Anshum Gupta
FYI, we generally don't consider weekends for the 72 hour window so we'd be waiting until Wednesday to close this one out.
Thought I'd let everyone who's waiting know about this.

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.

Artifacts:

Smoke tester:



Here's my +1:

SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]

--
Anshum Gupta



--
Anshum Gupta
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Adrien Grand
+1 SUCCESS! [0:57:52.080980]

Le mar. 3 mai 2016 à 19:36, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> a écrit :
FYI, we generally don't consider weekends for the 72 hour window so we'd be waiting until Wednesday to close this one out.
Thought I'd let everyone who's waiting know about this.

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.

Artifacts:

Smoke tester:



Here's my +1:

SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]

--
Anshum Gupta



--
Anshum Gupta
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Anshum Gupta
Here is a draft of the release notes. Feel free to edit and fix something that I missed,


On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Adrien Grand <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1 SUCCESS! [0:57:52.080980]

Le mar. 3 mai 2016 à 19:36, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> a écrit :
FYI, we generally don't consider weekends for the 72 hour window so we'd be waiting until Wednesday to close this one out.
Thought I'd let everyone who's waiting know about this.

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.

Artifacts:

Smoke tester:



Here's my +1:

SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]

--
Anshum Gupta



--
Anshum Gupta



--
Anshum Gupta
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Michael McCandless-2
I think there were no Lucene changes in this release vs 5.5.0?

So maybe the release notes should simply say:

  Lucene is perfect and has no bugs.


On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
Here is a draft of the release notes. Feel free to edit and fix something that I missed,


On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Adrien Grand <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1 SUCCESS! [0:57:52.080980]

Le mar. 3 mai 2016 à 19:36, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> a écrit :
FYI, we generally don't consider weekends for the 72 hour window so we'd be waiting until Wednesday to close this one out.
Thought I'd let everyone who's waiting know about this.

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.

Artifacts:

Smoke tester:



Here's my +1:

SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]

--
Anshum Gupta



--
Anshum Gupta



--
Anshum Gupta

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Walter Underwood
On May 4, 2016, at 11:50 AM, Michael McCandless <[hidden email]> wrote:

  Lucene is perfect and has no bugs.

The correct form of that statement is “the Lucene test suite is inadequate.” :-)

wunder
Walter Underwood
[hidden email]
http://observer.wunderwood.org/  (my blog)

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Anshum Gupta
In reply to this post by Michael McCandless-2
Mike, there were 3 bug fixes as per the change log. Also, no fixes != no bugs :).

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Michael McCandless <[hidden email]> wrote:
I think there were no Lucene changes in this release vs 5.5.0?

So maybe the release notes should simply say:

  Lucene is perfect and has no bugs.


On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
Here is a draft of the release notes. Feel free to edit and fix something that I missed,


On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Adrien Grand <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1 SUCCESS! [0:57:52.080980]

Le mar. 3 mai 2016 à 19:36, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> a écrit :
FYI, we generally don't consider weekends for the 72 hour window so we'd be waiting until Wednesday to close this one out.
Thought I'd let everyone who's waiting know about this.

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.

Artifacts:

Smoke tester:



Here's my +1:

SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]

--
Anshum Gupta



--
Anshum Gupta



--
Anshum Gupta




--
Anshum Gupta
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Michael McCandless-2
Oh sorry I thought there were 0 changes ;)


On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
Mike, there were 3 bug fixes as per the change log. Also, no fixes != no bugs :).

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Michael McCandless <[hidden email]> wrote:
I think there were no Lucene changes in this release vs 5.5.0?

So maybe the release notes should simply say:

  Lucene is perfect and has no bugs.


On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
Here is a draft of the release notes. Feel free to edit and fix something that I missed,


On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Adrien Grand <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1 SUCCESS! [0:57:52.080980]

Le mar. 3 mai 2016 à 19:36, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> a écrit :
FYI, we generally don't consider weekends for the 72 hour window so we'd be waiting until Wednesday to close this one out.
Thought I'd let everyone who's waiting know about this.

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.

Artifacts:

Smoke tester:



Here's my +1:

SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]

--
Anshum Gupta



--
Anshum Gupta



--
Anshum Gupta




--
Anshum Gupta

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Joel Bernstein
3 bugs fixes in Lucene! We should preface this with Lucene is riddled with bugs!


On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Michael McCandless <[hidden email]> wrote:
Oh sorry I thought there were 0 changes ;)


On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
Mike, there were 3 bug fixes as per the change log. Also, no fixes != no bugs :).

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Michael McCandless <[hidden email]> wrote:
I think there were no Lucene changes in this release vs 5.5.0?

So maybe the release notes should simply say:

  Lucene is perfect and has no bugs.


On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
Here is a draft of the release notes. Feel free to edit and fix something that I missed,


On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Adrien Grand <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1 SUCCESS! [0:57:52.080980]

Le mar. 3 mai 2016 à 19:36, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> a écrit :
FYI, we generally don't consider weekends for the 72 hour window so we'd be waiting until Wednesday to close this one out.
Thought I'd let everyone who's waiting know about this.

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.

Artifacts:

Smoke tester:



Here's my +1:

SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]

--
Anshum Gupta



--
Anshum Gupta



--
Anshum Gupta




--
Anshum Gupta


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.5.1

Michael McCandless-2
Good idea ;)


On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Joel Bernstein <[hidden email]> wrote:
3 bugs fixes in Lucene! We should preface this with Lucene is riddled with bugs!


On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Michael McCandless <[hidden email]> wrote:
Oh sorry I thought there were 0 changes ;)


On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
Mike, there were 3 bug fixes as per the change log. Also, no fixes != no bugs :).

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Michael McCandless <[hidden email]> wrote:
I think there were no Lucene changes in this release vs 5.5.0?

So maybe the release notes should simply say:

  Lucene is perfect and has no bugs.


On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
Here is a draft of the release notes. Feel free to edit and fix something that I missed,


On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Adrien Grand <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1 SUCCESS! [0:57:52.080980]

Le mar. 3 mai 2016 à 19:36, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> a écrit :
FYI, we generally don't consider weekends for the 72 hour window so we'd be waiting until Wednesday to close this one out.
Thought I'd let everyone who's waiting know about this.

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <[hidden email]> wrote:
Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1.

Artifacts:

Smoke tester:



Here's my +1:

SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268]

--
Anshum Gupta



--
Anshum Gupta



--
Anshum Gupta




--
Anshum Gupta